Bir önceki sayfanın en son iletisi:
Literatürde ADATS'ın semi active laser homming olduğu belirtiliyor ama yüksek hızlı hedefleri vuramadığından bahsedilmiş.
Vurma ihtimal %80 olarak belirtiliyor.
Ayrıca bu sistemden vazgeçilme nedeni bakım sıklığı. Ortalama 9 saatte bir kritik bir arıza gözlenmiş.
Ciritten olabilir. Helikopter, quadrocopter (dron) vs düşük hızlı hedeflerde başarılı olur bence.
Aslında hazır ürün var elimizde. Sadece yaklaşmalı tapa ve paralanma eklemek lazım, eğer yoksa.
"The ADATS is highly unusual among SAM systems in using semi-active laser guidance, instead of the more typical radio command, infrared, or radar guidance systems. The system's advantages are that its guidance is extremely precise, it won't trigger a radar warning receiver on board an enemy aircraft, and traditional countermeasures such as chaff, flares, and self-protection jammers have no effect against this guidance method. The ADATS has more than 80% hit probability of a target with a single missile at a maximum range.
However, as laser guidance is rapidly becoming dated, it also has numerous disadvantages. For example, the advent of laser detectors means the ADATS' famed element of surprise no longer exists, and the rapid evolution, proliferation, and application of laser dazzler technology means the ADATS' guidance (along with all of the optics and most of the sensors on the launch vehicle) are now easily defeated. As such, lasing the target could result in an immediate dazzler counterattack, destroying the optics and laser designator of the vehicle along with the seeker heads of any missiles in flight. Another issue is that keeping a fast-moving (and possibly evasive) airborne target illuminated with a laser spot is exceedingly difficult, even with 21st century technology."