Laser Targeting UAV, Evidence of Military Technology on 9/11

Back


Watch this video at
www.youtube.com/freedomlover911

Thanks for all of the comments and research assistance in the past several months since I first uploaded a raw version of this evidence. I hope this is presented in a way that creates more understanding in what occurred at the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Please rate, leave your comments and pass this on to everyone!

UPDATE:
Also now on Google Video:


Here is a very interesting link I found pertaining to remote control aircraft and military drones:


**********************************
Added July 25, 2008 -Reply to FAQs:

The laser movement was one item that confused me for awhile as I do know that LDs are typically stationary. It wasn't until I found the UAV moving at high speeds that it made sense. Also finding the reflections from above (in the smoke) and on the FNM building exposed the angle and approach of the source (the airborne platform). Observing the flight path and timing of the UAV makes this more clear. Had the UAV been following (behind) the Boeing it (the Laser signature) would have been stationary.

Here is where I have to insert my own theory: the UAV was off of the intended flight path and approached from the SW instead of S as the Boeing traveled. It may have been late to the target and in order to catch up, it cut the angle and projected the laser just moments before impact. Also, this UAV drone likely equipped with a Williams Research turbine jet has a max speed of approx 250mph and the Boeing was traveling at least twice that fast. Because of the laser appearing on the building in the foreground (appears to be next to towers) I have estimated that the UAV must be at a much higher altitude and actually out over the bay at the time of the targeting operation.

As you can see in the video, the moment sensors on the Boeing pick up the laser, the remote controlled plane banks to port (left) and hits just below the laser. The plane appeared to be slightly off course as well. Had the laser been done correctly and timely, the plane would have had more time to correct and would have hit the target on center just like the N Tower job.

This would explain both the moving laser AND why the plane suddenly turned. Had a human pilot been on the plane, there would have been no way at those speeds to detect and correct an off-target approach. The maneuver was entirely mechanical.

You may find it interesting that I give credit to Killtown for helping me find the reflections of the laser. He did a "hit piece" video to show the reflection (paper) on the FNM building. Seeing this I postulated that there may be another reflection in the smoke and I knew where to look now (45 degrees up and to the left). I looked closely and viola! There it was! Perfect timing and brilliance. It all came together.
This confirmed for me at least that all of these associated pieces meant that the plane was real, remote controlled and laser guided.

Here is another FAQ "what happened to the passengers?"

Reposted here:

And here:

Video links:



More analysis of the "dot" by "ABC1416" here (thanks for the lead SpudXXXX!):


One other FAQ:
"why does the laser appear to 'go through' the tower? It couldn't possibly be a reflection!",
and response:
I made the same mistake at first!
You are seeing an optical 2D illusion that makes it appear to "go through" the building. First thing I had to do was to identify that green top building. I looked long and hard on Google Earth for that building and discovered the "Federal National Memorial Building". Turns out it is about six blocks away to the SE. You are actually seeing the reflection off the south side of the south tower to the west side of the FNMB. Most people confuse this building with the Woolworth Building, but upon closer inspection you can see the differences. That is why I point out the two in the video. Pay close attention to the annotations.

Explanation of Laser Designation:


***********************************
Northwoods Document:

"drone (unmanned)" on pg 8 (3/b). Page 9 section 6, "military drone aircraft" and "modifying an aircraft" to appear as a Cuban Mig. Page 10 section 8 describes how a "passenger" plane would be disguised and shot down with a fake passenger list.
Also on page 8, section 2/a/11 "mock victims". More about fake passengers...
*******************************

Please feel free to comment!
Peace
FL911

****************************

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: April 16, 2008 at 2:55 am
Author: Freedomlover911

Length: 00:08:31
Rating: 4.15
Views: 19842

Tags: 9/11 UAV Laser Military War Bush Cheney RNC September WTC Osama Obama Clinton Iraq Iran Afghanistan Terrorism Islam Air Force Navy Blackwater McCain TV Fakery Debunked Hologram Theory Muslim Christian Israel Religion Rapture 2012 Pisces Aquarius Pakistan Al Queda Democrat Republican 2008 Election Marines Combat Army Pentagon Rumsfeld Feith Commission Investigation Hydrogen HAARP Aliens Weather China Russia Europe Britain SSP Amero Alex Jones Loose Change UA175 93 11 77 Impeachment Hearings

Video Comments:
Freedomlover911 (August 28, 2008 at 11:18 pm)
The Krongard brothers are tied into Blackwater, airline put options, state dept contracts and Buzzy was a board member while his brother was blocking any investigations of wrong doing by Blackwater. maybe I need to do a video to demonstrate. I will work on the script this weekend. I still have some more reading to do!
rossitondc36 (August 28, 2008 at 1:09 am)
okay i have a question. if the plane that hit the south tower was a military aircraft what really happened to the people on the flight that hit it. it doesnt make sense
Freedomlover911 (August 28, 2008 at 1:22 am)
Good question rossitondc! Of course you are asking about Flt 11. I've heard the Betty Ong tapes and it does sound legit to me. Whether Otta actually did fly the plane into the tower or if there was some remote flying technology that took over is unconfirmable. UA175 hitting the N Tower appears to be an aircraft other than a UA plane. If you want my honest opinion I think it was not "military" but a plane owned and remotely flown by contracted blackops mercs (like Blackwater). I am researching...
Spookysr (August 28, 2008 at 5:23 am)
Freedomlover911 - I'm still not feeling Blackwater. Yet stranger things have happened. I need you to look at a more likely candidate WORSE than BW - DynCorp a CSC company.
Freedomlover911 (August 28, 2008 at 1:31 am)
Some interesting "passenger" facts
Flight 11: of the 92 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 20 are listed in the SSDI (22%)
Of these 20 people, only three are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Judy Larocque
Laurie Neira
Candace Lee Williams
Flight 77: of the 64 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 14 are listed in the SSDI (22%)
Of these 64 people, only five on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
William Caswell
Eddie Dillard
Ian Gray
John Sammartino
Leonard Taylor
Freedomlover911 (August 28, 2008 at 1:32 am)
Con't:
Flight 175: of the 65 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 18 are listed in the SSDI (28%)
Of these 65 people, only three are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Michael C. Tarrou
Gloria Debarrera
Timothy Ward
Flight 93: of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI (13%)
Of these 45 people, none are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
No one
Spookysr (August 28, 2008 at 5:21 am)
rossitondc36 - Check the flight path of both ill-fated flights. They both cross EXACTLY over 2-3 USAF bases (i.e. Westover, McGuire, and Stewart). They could have landed at any one of them and were off-loaded. They could either be now in a high-security psych hosp, exposed to amnesia drug and released to street as homeless ppl, or in the worst-case scenario you-know-what.

Note that air bases are equipped w/alert aircraft yet scrambled from Otis. Flew SUB SONIC to intercept @ NYC. Wierd huh?
Freedomlover911 (August 28, 2008 at 12:00 am)
I'm reading a book called "911 False Flag" right now. Besides his "LIHOP" belief, he does make some interesting connections to Blackwater that I hadn't even thought of. I also make connections to Blackwater by following the money. You may want to pick up a copy...it is interesting! This guy used to run black ops flights for old Ollie North.
Freedomlover911 (August 27, 2008 at 11:57 pm)
Spooksr,
I have a good idea on the engine technology, but I am at a loss for the actual UAV model. Whether that thing is in our listed military inventory is doubtful. This was one of those black-ops birds where money is no object and they can purchase any kind of experimental top of the line gear. In my close-up images it appears to have a tiny fuselage with straight wings and a V tail. Almost like a mini-Global Hawk. Maybe that will help??
Spookysr (August 28, 2008 at 5:31 am)
F911 - Check out the dual tail section of this UAV tinyurl . com /6j7jed - Look famliar?