911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77

Back


A short animation with video and photos illustrating the final moments of Flight 77 on September 11, 2001.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: June 30, 2006 at 4:41 am
Author: mikejwilson

Length: 00:06:16
Rating: 4.10
Views: 1368058

Tags: 911 pentagon flight 77 boeing solidworks case study flight77 truth 9/11 plane jet war conspiracy politics missile global

Video Comments:
marksman500 (October 12, 2008 at 4:38 pm)
waken,

Are you ever goin to answer?
Been a few days now!

waken..."planting the FDR adds to the myth that a 757 did crash their."...
----
It does? Please explain how 2 FDR's were needed to .."adds to the myth that a 757 did crash their"..?

Why wouldnt the one/original ..."FDR adds to the myth that a 757 did crash their"..?

Saying ..."it is likely both were planted."...
Likely?...as in could have? Hmm,
Are you SPECULATION again!...lol
marksman500 (October 12, 2008 at 4:35 pm)
waken
Lmao!!! Waken is getting desprate agagn!

For some reason waken didnt mention all of the post. I wonder why?..lol

"I said:.. ""You and I"" both ""know"" there are no pictures avaliable of Passengers in their seats."

""If there were, I would have been on it a long time ago!""

I was refering to the witnesses who saw Passengers in their seats.

There is no reason to lie or make shit up as you do!
tubegovernment (October 12, 2008 at 3:06 pm)
800 Billion AMERO transferred from NWO to CHINA.

investment-blog. net/us-ships-800-billion-ameros-to-china-prepares-to-de-monetize-us-dollar/

9/11 will not go away.
tubegovernment (October 12, 2008 at 2:59 pm)
MuckupAgain

well, wanke has a point there. you have provided ZERO evidence. its not unusual to ask for it then, especially if you claim mifs, which do not support the gov. version.

basically what you are saying is that there are 2 gov. versions of 9/11. one is right and one is wrong. its insane isnt it.
krystle226 (October 12, 2008 at 12:25 pm)
mans you are so odd. why do you like my pictures so much?
MuckupAgain (October 12, 2008 at 12:16 pm)
"You are such a liar, marksman."

At least he's looking at the evidence available and not discrediting it with specious claims about planted evidence.

Cue Wakenbake asking for serial numbers. Then metalurgical analysis. The piccies of rivets. then a piccie of the pilots eyeball. Etc, etc. On and on.

Best light up another and feed that paranoia....
MuckupAgain (October 12, 2008 at 12:14 pm)
"but on the other hand a tomahawk missle does" Once in cruise, a Tomahawk uses a small jet engine fueled with jet fuel. So how does it burn white when that same fuel in a B757 can't?

"Funny thing about jet fuel is that is doesnt burn white"

True, but if you take a hydro-carbon fuel and inject it into a stream of hot air (say the exhaust of a jet engine) it does produce lots of white smoke.

I wonder if damage to wing/engine could have resulted in fuel getting into the exhaust?
AbyssBoundTraitors (October 12, 2008 at 11:47 am)
Perpetration of a Fraud and conspiracy to cover up a fraud include those who are being paid to post chat information that assist in the coverup. Traitors, Treason, Obstruction of Justice related to High Crimes are all punishable by death.
BottleMeetsFace (October 12, 2008 at 10:58 am)
Plus if a boeing 757 flew across a high way there wouldnt be anycars left on it cause it produces over 40,000 pounds of thrust
BottleMeetsFace (October 12, 2008 at 10:56 am)
Funny thing about jet fuel is that is doesnt burn white, there is no magnesium in it to cause it to burn white... but on the other hand a tomahawk missle does... and those pictures of plane debrise isnt sufficent enough proof when are Rolls-Royce RB211, Pratt & Whitney PW2037, PW2040, or PW2043 engines that weight in at of 10k pounds i didnt see them did you... and the hole in the wall wasnt even 70ft across, but a 757 is 124 ft 10 inches across, 44 ft 6 in high and 178 ft 7 in long