Theory and Practice of Cryptography
BackGoogle Tech Talks
December, 19 2007
Topics include: Introduction to Modern Cryptography, Using Cryptography in Practice and at Google, Proofs of Security and Security Definitions and A Special Topic in Cryptography
This talk is one in a series hosted by Google University: Wednesdays, 11/28/07 - 12/19/07 from 1-2pm
Speaker: Steve Weis
Steve Weis received his PhD from the Cryptography and Information Security group at MIT, where he was advised by Ron Rivest. He is a member of Google's Applied Security (AppSec) team and is the technical lead for Google's internal cryptographic library, KeyMaster.
Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: December 21, 2007 at 12:12 pm
Author: googletechtalks
Length: 01:32:06
Rating: 4.77
Views: 11449
Tags: google techtalks techtalk engedu talk talks googletechtalks education
Video Comments:
MageFX (October 16, 2008 at 8:33 pm)
i need someone to likc my pussy h
07904662391 (October 15, 2008 at 8:31 pm)
g i want some sexy subscribers! w
jr3470 (August 28, 2008 at 6:06 am)
my friend that's 15 wrote it in LSL language o_o and i still don't really know what it is just something that hides your password
StephenWeis (August 22, 2008 at 9:33 pm)
As a follow up, Ben has built his voter-verifiable voting system on the web. Look for Helios Voting.
polarbear60 (June 23, 2008 at 1:15 am)
You asshole! You are talking about voting and you have a preference? Where is your integrity!!!
kimshepherd (January 10, 2008 at 7:12 am)
Excellent video, way better than hearing about Alice and Bob and Eve again... great examples, great ideas, great explanations.
AllAboutVoting (December 29, 2007 at 1:58 am)
I really enjoyed this talk.
StephenWeis (December 26, 2007 at 11:01 am)
Excellent talk.
kimshepherd (January 10, 2008 at 7:49 am)
:)
Quick question: I wonder whether it would be dangerous to rely on one centralised website or 'bulletin board', to avoid coercers taking over a university or ISP proxy server and fooling many voters into thinking their votes are corrupted...
How important is the bulletin board itself in the overall auditing scheme?
Quick question: I wonder whether it would be dangerous to rely on one centralised website or 'bulletin board', to avoid coercers taking over a university or ISP proxy server and fooling many voters into thinking their votes are corrupted...
How important is the bulletin board itself in the overall auditing scheme?
StephenWeis (January 10, 2008 at 9:27 am)
There doesn't have to be one centralized bulletin board. The key property Ben is trying to get at with the bulletin board analogy is that voters can go and check that their encrypted ballot appears in some publicly accessible repository, which may be distributed.
If the vote does not appear, then the voter will have a receipt that they can turn over to an investigative agency.
Denial of service, like in the example you give, is always a risk, but can be detected and prevented.
If the vote does not appear, then the voter will have a receipt that they can turn over to an investigative agency.
Denial of service, like in the example you give, is always a risk, but can be detected and prevented.
-
Menu
World Defense industry Files -
Tags:
wdif military tsk silah sanayi jet figters Tank JSF Lockheed weapons Attack Helicopters Predator navy Airforce Armed forces Army Missile su37 f16 Airshow dogfight f18 Cobra aselsan uav red flag fighter aviation patriot missile s 300 navy ships nato longbow havoc rooivalk KA-50 iraq war mangusta a129 merkava abrams t-90 submarine u209 exocet zubr kornet drone sparrow uav dasault rafale trmilitary Manuevers Northrop Grumman Raytheon BAE Systems L-3 Communications General Dynamics V-22 Osprey Textron EADS Defense Thales defence Saab Defense Otokar Russian Submarine