How It All Ends

Back


An undeniable conclusion. (Go ahead. . . Try.) WARNING: mature content may be disturbing to some viewers.

Created by Greg Craven, Corvallis, Oregon, United States.

****BULLETIN (09FEB08): CHECK OUT THE UPDATE ON THE SUCCESS OF THESE VIDEOS. It's titled "Operation Saturation: On the Threshold," and can be found here: *****

For your navigation pleasure, the following is a list of the URLs of the entire "Expansion Pack" of videos supporting the video "How It All Ends." These videos anticipate and answer EVERY OBJECTION OR CRITICISM of the argument contained in "How It All Ends" that the author has ever heard. Unbelievable, but true. Go ahead--take 'er for a spin and see if you can find any holes!

Just click and enjoy! (Or, have the hairs on the back of your neck raised. . . )

The original video and the entire "Expansion Pack" are also available for download as MP4 files, available for editing, burning, subtitling, mashing up, ripping off, making fun of--whatever. You can download those--as well as the scripts of all the videos--at manpollo.org

Manpollo.org and wonderingmind42.com also both offer a much easier navigation experience than the links below, as well as discussion forums, and other resources. Check them out!

"How It All Ends" Expansion Pack
Index


Menu


Trailer


Nature of Science




Risk Management








Why There Is Still Debate



The Manpollo Project



Mechanics of GCC




Scare Tactics







The Solution





God's Will


Get What You Want




I Hope I'm Wrong



No Holds Barred







Your Mission



Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: October 11, 2007 at 3:22 am
Author: wonderingmind42

Length: 00:09:58
Rating: 4.63
Views: 570792

Tags: global warming climate change controversy carbon debate risk management most terrifying video ever see

Video Comments:
imdefender (October 11, 2008 at 6:23 am)
Why should I trust the Scientists on climate change when when they can't even get tomorrows weather right?
grastog1313 (October 11, 2008 at 4:29 am)
If we had died before the Industrial era, CO2 would be stable at about 280 ppm. Currently, with a radiative imbalance of 0.85 W/m^2, moderate warming is inevitable even if CO2 could be prevented from rising further. The serious danger lies in more severe warming from unabated CO2 increases. Significant cooling from natural variation is not a realistic possibility in light of our current CO2 levels.
manwihthat (October 11, 2008 at 4:14 am)
You still have us in the picture and the CO2 levels will and have gone up and down WITHOUT are help. So what would the CO2 level range would be if we died out over something like 500 years ago? NOT what it we contributed to it over the past 150 years.

You should also know that the cold is much hard to live through and kills about ten times the people as cold.
grastog1313 (October 11, 2008 at 3:02 am)
Before the Industrial era, which has contributed a 38% rise in CO2 to the current 385 ppm, CO2 levels were much lower (typically in the 280 ppm range) for at least the past 650,000 years and probably much longer. We know from carbon isotope analysis that the increase (and the consequent warming) is due mainly to fossil fuel burning. The "debate" on reducing CO2 is essentially over in the outside world, but the various options for accmplishing it are still subjects of much controversy.
manwihthat (October 11, 2008 at 2:52 am)
Does anyone know what CO2 levels would be if we weren't here? For some reason I don't think they be that different than what we have know.
roseminty (October 11, 2008 at 12:47 am)
Oh my goodness! It's an upside-down comment!
TheComputerMaster (October 10, 2008 at 5:34 pm)
ןoן suoıʇɔnpoɹd ɹǝʇsɐɯɹǝʇndɯoɔǝɥʇ ƃuısooɥɔ ɹoɟ sʞuɐɥʇ sʎɐʍʎuɐ ɐǝʎ ʇnq uoıuıdo ɹnoʎ puɐʇsɹǝpun ı puɐ ʇuǝɯǝʇɐʇs pooƃ ʎןןɐǝɹ ɐ sı sıɥʇ
grastog1313 (October 9, 2008 at 11:06 pm)
In my view, carbon taxes will not be the first strategy to control CO2, but rather carbon cap-and-trade policies modeled (as already note) on acid rain reduction cap and trade in the U.S. Ultimately, carbon taxes may be needed if unacceptable CO2 and warming proceed despite cap-and-trade arrangements combined with alternative energy development. Given current CO2 emissions rate, however, and the dangers they pose - both human and economic - that necessity may emerge sooner rather than later.
greenerguardian (October 9, 2008 at 4:48 pm)
Relly - You raise a relevant point. Now that the scientific issues are almost completely settled, the global community has committed itself to CO2 reduction, but without a uniform agreement on mechanism. Most likely, international carbon cap-and-trade policies will be implemented (based on successful acid rain reduction in the U.S.), but whether carbon taxes will also be needed depends on how promptly CO2 can be reduced without them, given the enormous potential cost of uncontrolled CO2 rises.
RellyR510 (October 9, 2008 at 2:17 pm)
NWO is pushing global warming scam...for social engineering just a little simple research will uncover this fraud...Global Carbon Taxes people????