Terrorism: Ron Paul vs. Giuliani @ SC Debate

Back


Ron Paul explains the damage that an interventionist policy can have when it comes to violent blowback. Giuliani throws a fit. See the transcript at ironpaul.com

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: May 16, 2007 at 7:26 am
Author: iRonPaulcom

Length: 00:04:34
Rating: 4.81
Views: 216952

Tags: ron paul giuliani terrorism iraq ronpaul vietnam reagan blowback

Video Comments:
bmdude7 (November 18, 2008 at 9:43 pm)
Ron Paul is the only Republican who hasn't completely lost his mind.

You heard how much the crowd (presumably Republican) loved Giuliani's response. Republicans love the idea that Muslims are evil incarnate and that they only attack us because we are free and predominately Christian. Unfortunately that idea is not based in reality at all. Brazil is free and Christian, and would make an easier target than us. Why didn't they attack Brazil?
jaredhutcheson (November 18, 2008 at 2:54 am)
Giuliani is a flag-waving idiot.
HrvRoy (November 17, 2008 at 3:01 am)
If only they got Giuliani in 2001!
t66wood (November 17, 2008 at 2:01 am)
Ron Paul's opinion is supported by facts he presented, Rudy presented no facts to the contary, making it a one sided debate in the favor of truth, in the favor of Dr. Ron Paul. Also, this footage could have easily edited to cater the crowd to Rudy's favor, as Big Brother (Faux News) would want. Ron Paul and the few like him speak the truth, and until the people wake up and realize that Fox "News" is bias and turn to other new organizations, the people will always be blinded by bias. Ron Paul!!
coffeeintheface (November 13, 2008 at 4:01 am)
Paul completely owned Giuliani and all those idiots by explaining how our overthrow of Mossadeq and installment of the Shah of Iran in 1953 LED to their hatred towards us today. These people either don't know history or choose to ignore it. All the countries that hate us today, and Al Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11, did so as a reaction to either State occupation, violence, or both. As with every problem, big gov is to blame and then citizens are EXPECTED to believe in the cause.
ceviche666 (November 12, 2008 at 7:46 am)
Now that's the real STRAIGHT TALK express.Unfortunately as much as I admire this man he is non-electable. He's not a sellout and doesn't cater or cowtow to his party or voters. Such is the game of politics in this country...
trinsit (November 10, 2008 at 8:31 am)
With the education system as it is, is it really surprising? Now a days, a person has to go seek their own education to truly know something, instead of the adults passing it down to the youth, as it should be.
medicineman4ever (November 10, 2008 at 10:04 am)
Indeed.
trinsit (November 10, 2008 at 8:27 am)
If the race came down to Ron Paul vs. Obama. I would be for Ron Paul, but on a certain level, wouldn't care who won.
VF5 (November 12, 2008 at 8:57 am)
I support Obama, but I agree with you. I wouldn't feel bad if Paul does win. He has my respect; the only republican who speak the truth and don't give a shit about the status quo.