9/11 Flight 93 Rare Footage

Back


Ultra-rare news footage from the crash site of United Flight 93 which has never been seen again since 9/11.

Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: April 21, 2006 at 10:54 am
Author: thetruthwillout

Length: 00:02:22
Rating: 4.56
Views: 3616473

Tags: 9/11 United Flight 93

Video Comments:
cchris874 (November 19, 2008 at 7:52 am)
alex: "but was instead shot down by U.S. military forces and subsequently crash"

Last week you stated it landed in Cleveland. What will it be next week, beamed up to an alien spaceship?
electriccarmusic (November 19, 2008 at 6:49 am)
Cruising speed 300 mph, supposed impact 500mph, supposed angle 40 degrees. Plane vanishes, seats luggage tail section, bodies and all. Never happened before.
No photos showing the men in yellow, the smokey little hole, the crane, the wreckage all together. That's strange.
All that jet fuel. Grass still green.
Then there's the pentagon, symmetrical bldg 7 crash, the Cia anthrax guy, Bin Ladin's escape from Torabora, passport on footpath, yellowcake, WMD's, Rummy's "drill",
AlQeada-Hussein tie JFK
skizombie (November 19, 2008 at 7:27 am)
electric
Nice one!
Some people do not see, or want to see, a problem here.
And that is just the tip of the berg.
The more you look, the more bullshit is uncovered.
Investigation needed!
cchris874 (November 19, 2008 at 7:44 am)
ski: "Some people do not see, or want to see, a problem here."

It depends on which problems one wants to focus on. If you want to maintain faked crashes, then you're introducing many times more improbables, such as: witnesses at Shanksville paid off or lying; phone calls w voice morphing technolology or faked relatives; ATC people lied or paid off to say they communicated with F93; the quitest CDs in history; firing a missile above rush hour traffic, etc. How likely is this?
cchris874 (November 19, 2008 at 7:48 am)
This is the problem, it seems to me. I can understand that 9/11 was a fantastic event, and many parts of it may seem beyond belief. But the mistake most truthers make IMHO is their failure to comprehend that an inside job is also utterly fantastic when you consider the implications of so many faked events, and the ability to keep it all secret for 7 years. It's orders of magnitude nore preposterous, IMO. Which is why most sensible people aren't buying it. JMHO.
dudeman5790 (November 19, 2008 at 4:32 am)
maybe its because it was going 1500 mph straight into the ground?
rangeyer (November 19, 2008 at 4:11 am)
The military blew up flight 93 to protect washington DC. It didn't crash.
dudeman5790 (November 19, 2008 at 4:30 am)
shut the fuck up. tell that to the black box.
katyu16 (November 19, 2008 at 2:37 am)
New Baltimore, Pa. Is that where the photos of people gathering debris were taken? That makes more sense than Shanksville. But one question: Why nobody else is writing about this?
brian78045 (November 19, 2008 at 1:56 am)
Theres an interesting article on Flight 93 at DNotice (org) titled "One Of Our Aircraft Isn't Missing". It has some new research.