The Photoshop Effect
BackJoin Sarah from diet.com as she gets a Photoshop Tutorial and a makeover. Discover the truth behind adobe Photoshop and photo retouch. Weight loss controversy and celebrity deceit, what is real? What is fake? See Sarah Dussault of Diet.com's before and after picture. Special Thanks, Tim Lynch Photography in Boston, MA.
Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: June 16, 2008 at 7:02 pm
Author: diethealth
Length: 00:05:37
Rating: 4.65
Views: 1375667
Tags: photoshop adobe retouch real makeover beauty product images dove photo before after tim lynch diet.com/videos
Video Comments:
manhattanprojec7 (October 12, 2008 at 9:22 am)
host is hot.. with or without photoshop
rednebula317 (October 12, 2008 at 4:07 am)
"Editors assume we know " They might as well put a label on it saying that it was photoshopped.
coldflame2007 (October 12, 2008 at 3:14 am)
plus i dont think she needed PS XD
coldflame2007 (October 12, 2008 at 3:12 am)
plastic surgery in pictures lol
1400yoJoke (October 12, 2008 at 2:36 am)
my last response was to CoconutRen, youtube is fucking useless at this reply shit,
1400yoJoke (October 12, 2008 at 2:34 am)
age lines etc. ????
L4s4gn3 (October 12, 2008 at 2:21 am)
Photoshop just kicks ass!!!
ruichichan (October 12, 2008 at 12:05 am)
that would suck so much for all of the magazine companies, commercials, and even stores. Basically that would be a label that says "I am lying to you completely" because no one would know how much you had to alter the picture.
vasilebujor67 (October 11, 2008 at 11:43 pm)
Hi,
I consider that the easy way is to banne it! But that will fail, so I think laws has to be created because you miss inform the reader. On the photo next to the name of photographer there should be a phrase " digitally modified " or something like that. There are cases were is normal to modify the picture, when the man/woman suffer from burns or injuries or even aging, but the reader must be informed.
Respectfully,
Vasile Bujor
I consider that the easy way is to banne it! But that will fail, so I think laws has to be created because you miss inform the reader. On the photo next to the name of photographer there should be a phrase " digitally modified " or something like that. There are cases were is normal to modify the picture, when the man/woman suffer from burns or injuries or even aging, but the reader must be informed.
Respectfully,
Vasile Bujor
bivvyfox (October 11, 2008 at 10:59 pm)
It should not be banned. But it's still wrong. Something needs to change somewhere, most likely with the public. Videos like this are a great sign that change is in the process of happening.
-
Menu
World Defense industry Files -
Tags:
wdif military tsk silah sanayi jet figters Tank JSF Lockheed weapons Attack Helicopters Predator navy Airforce Armed forces Army Missile su37 f16 Airshow dogfight f18 Cobra aselsan uav red flag fighter aviation patriot missile s 300 navy ships nato longbow havoc rooivalk KA-50 iraq war mangusta a129 merkava abrams t-90 submarine u209 exocet zubr kornet drone sparrow uav dasault rafale trmilitary Manuevers Northrop Grumman Raytheon BAE Systems L-3 Communications General Dynamics V-22 Osprey Textron EADS Defense Thales defence Saab Defense Otokar Russian Submarine