Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing

Back


This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: February 23, 2007 at 8:29 pm
Author: ravious260

Length: 00:10:01
Rating: 3.75
Views: 1324460

Tags: SPACE EARTH SCIENCE HISTORY CONSPIRACY BUSH WAR ADULT KNOW THESE WORD ARE NOT IN HERE BUT THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT

Video Comments:
Alechin125 (October 13, 2008 at 4:00 pm)
O2?
timbothemighty (October 13, 2008 at 3:47 pm)
Hi Neal, I do believe that india 'crashed' into asia as the Indian plate moved north into the eurasian plate although the plate was only moving at 15cm a year, i guess it was more of a gentle shove. India isn't covered with mountain ranges but the point where the two plates meet is where the Himalayas are. slam was probably the wrong word to use. dunno about the bricks, bricks however have nothing to do with 70km thick pieces of rock moving with unbelievably large amounts of weight and pressure.
timbothemighty (October 13, 2008 at 3:46 pm)
The top buckles as this is just the expansion of the areas that are being pushed together. there is another Mountain range of equal size upside down, on the 'inside' of the crust. this is just the effect of two objects pushing into one another. the range is made of both plates, not just asia, india was damaged by the pushing.
The earth may be expanding but i think to disregard the past tectonic plate movements in your calculations leaves to many geographical phenomenon's without an origin.
nealadamsdotcom (October 13, 2008 at 2:19 pm)
Overlord. All that is shown is that the southern rift, the Antarctic ocean rift and spread is simply SPREADNG 360 degrees around Antartica, pushing all land masses away. That's Africa, South America, Australia and India and Even Asia. But the Mountains are rising because ASIA is RE-Curving and buckling. FROM ALL SIDES. Continents DON'T crash.
MrKappaBeta (October 13, 2008 at 8:46 am)
"It is common knowledge"

What is common knowledge?

The wiki says that no one has provided evidence that one side of a sub-duction zone trench is older than the other side?

Is that true? Both sides of an ocean trench are the same age?
MorituriMax (October 13, 2008 at 8:17 am)
kappa, "I don't know why think calling somebody a liar is somehow going to change reality. "

Really. Then why do you do it over and over again?
MrKappaBeta (October 13, 2008 at 7:29 am)
Overlord... What am I lying about? Magnetic Ropes? They've been hypothesized since the turn of the century. Nasa's THEMIS program has found them.

I don't know why think calling somebody a liar is somehow going to change reality.
OverlordShamala (October 13, 2008 at 8:34 am)
They were never hypothesized since the turn of the century. They were discovered, most things are discovered.
MrKappaBeta (October 13, 2008 at 8:39 am)
I meant since the turn of last century.

en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Birkeland_current
OverlordShamala (October 13, 2008 at 7:20 am)
As always Kappa, misreading articles about the magnetic rope, the ionized particles streaming from the sun to the Earth only powers geomagnetic storms and magnifies auroras.

Im not sure if you purposely misread the news articles & exagerate, but doing so is misinforming. To explain it more clearly to you. You are lying.

Unless you simply have problems comprehending English, then thats a whole different problem.