Imagining the Tenth Dimension part 2 of 2

Back


Watch the new annotated version:
This is the second part of the animation illustrating the concepts found in chapter one of the book "Imagining the Tenth Dimension - a new way of thinking about time and space" by Rob Bryanton, from tenthdimension.com


full version


Channel: Film & Animation
Uploaded: January 13, 2007 at 9:56 pm
Author: 10thdim

Length: 00:05:01
Rating: 4.89
Views: 168931

Tags: philosophy science theory space time dimensions tenthdimension Bryanton physics

Video Comments:
jaguarclaw (November 18, 2008 at 6:56 pm)
I think the scientists are a bit over zealous. But I have found a few flaws with einsteins theorys. I think we are overcomplicating things. I think trying to comprehend other dimensions is just too big for us at this moment.
10thdim (November 18, 2008 at 12:44 pm)
As Cosmologist Max Tegmark of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology says: "The critique of many worlds is shifting from 'it makes no sense and I hate it' to simply 'I hate it'."

So - not every scientist agrees with the Many Worlds Interpretation. But now that physicist David Deutsch and his team at Oxford have published a proof equating these quantum outcomes with the parallel universes created through choice, your opinion disagrees with mainstream physicists like Tegmark and Deutsch.

Rob
otonanoC (November 18, 2008 at 11:13 am)
These videos are nonsense. The 4th dimension must be exactly equal to the line connecting the big bang to the end of this universe. Somehow, this video inserted a HUMAN BEING into the mix as some sort of cosmic observer, and then used human choice as a means of "branching" into the 5th and 6th dimensions. These videos are stupid. The 5th and 6th dimensions are not "branches" based off of human choice. Think about it, people.
Dan4157 (November 18, 2008 at 1:25 am)
Yay, I understand it now!!
bobulibobium (November 16, 2008 at 8:35 am)
I once sat on a turtle, it felt gooood!
ShinobiGarth (November 16, 2008 at 6:35 am)
wow...really intriguing. but i actually understood what he was talking about. crazy! now if we could only figure out how to bridge those dimensions and cross them. why? it would be a fun "field trip".
babylittlekelvin (November 16, 2008 at 2:37 am)
is it just me or is this confusing :P
Melissa4pple (November 15, 2008 at 8:03 pm)
You're most probarbly saying this because you don't understand it. Many people find this sort of thing interesting. If you don't like it, smiply click the X in the corner of your screen.
Ackalan (November 15, 2008 at 3:37 pm)
Nice. Exept for mayby one thing. A 2D reality would have to be twisted two times since it can't have a "backside".

Based from a 3D point of view. ;)
4darin5 (November 14, 2008 at 6:34 am)
Really cool video. But, I'm a bit confusedabout one thing.

The Big Bang?

You mean, when the priest got ahold of those little boys?