Iraq for Sale Banned Excerpts
BackOn May 10th, 2007, this video was banned in Congress
Robert Greenwald, the director of IRAQ FOR SALE, was invited to testify before Congress by Rep. Jim Moran. He prepared four minutes from the documentary to show.
Republicans insisted this not be shown.
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: May 10, 2007 at 5:42 am
Author: bravenewfilms
Length: 00:04:36
Rating: 4.88
Views: 331439
Tags: Iraq for Sale Robert Greenwald Brave New Films Banned Congress Testimony
Video Comments:
diiiiiiiiiiib (August 25, 2008 at 2:07 am)
america bad people
united crap of america
shat up
united crap of america
shat up
pualywog (August 23, 2008 at 9:38 am)
holy fuck ill go there and wash cloths
!
!
creten69 (August 21, 2008 at 8:22 am)
the food was sooo good,3 buffets a day,everyone got fat,i run and shit,and i got fat.O yeah america employs slaves too.noone is mentioning that.$6 a day for local nationals,and in iraq we treat the nepals and indians like shiete,well there companies do,2 years atthe camp,and they eat shit and get searched,all night sometimes.I could go on and on but fuk you look it up
akajinxlawl (August 20, 2008 at 8:06 am)
Please vote to impeach Bush
Go to the video "We did it!" - yUuhKJYFUfg
Our senators are working for us
Go to the video "We did it!" - yUuhKJYFUfg
Our senators are working for us
CommanderUTube (August 18, 2008 at 4:42 pm)
This is done so that the cost of invasion and occupation gets paid and recharged to the Iraqis under occupation. One way of extracting money from the oil money otherwise going to insurgents or corrupt officials, no doubt.
The NWO has its own rationale for doing things. Why ask the awkard questions? The first audit of the occupation expenses ( probably oil revenue too) revealed apparently some 80% of the charges could not be said to meet the standards required in terms of proper accountability
The NWO has its own rationale for doing things. Why ask the awkard questions? The first audit of the occupation expenses ( probably oil revenue too) revealed apparently some 80% of the charges could not be said to meet the standards required in terms of proper accountability
CityzenJane (August 18, 2008 at 5:09 am)
THIS IS OBSCENE.
otacon451 (August 17, 2008 at 3:30 am)
i doubt what these people are saying is inaccurate
Zarbod (August 14, 2008 at 2:28 am)
What does it mean that this was banned?
HudsonRand (August 2, 2008 at 7:35 am)
Without Navy cooks we would have no population of pretty young Filipinas in San Diego. Dude, outsourcing is not the answer to our problems.
-
Menu
World Defense industry Files -
Tags:
wdif military tsk silah sanayi jet figters Tank JSF Lockheed weapons Attack Helicopters Predator navy Airforce Armed forces Army Missile su37 f16 Airshow dogfight f18 Cobra aselsan uav red flag fighter aviation patriot missile s 300 navy ships nato longbow havoc rooivalk KA-50 iraq war mangusta a129 merkava abrams t-90 submarine u209 exocet zubr kornet drone sparrow uav dasault rafale trmilitary Manuevers Northrop Grumman Raytheon BAE Systems L-3 Communications General Dynamics V-22 Osprey Textron EADS Defense Thales defence Saab Defense Otokar Russian Submarine
It is in wikipedia!!! google "Operation Northwoods"