WTC Core

Back


A more realistic representation of the backbone of the WTC. The building's backbone that NIST and FEMA ignored.

Channel: Entertainment
Uploaded: September 15, 2006 at 4:14 pm
Author: mmmlink

Length: 00:08:03
Rating: 4.57
Views: 116819

Tags: wtc wtc1 wtc2 core world trade center animation simulation 911 9/11 fema nist truss perimeter

Video Comments:
nicfromwashington (October 6, 2008 at 2:24 am)
Your 3D animation skills I give a C+.

Your rediculous theory I give an F-

It is widely known that the WTC towers had more of an "Exoskeleton" design. Most of the weight of the above floors were supported by the OUTSIDE of the building (Hence such tiny windows).

This design made it possible to have more "Open" office space, while having a SECONDARY support system in the core (Elevators).
edneymac (September 26, 2008 at 10:38 pm)
muito bom!!
1RadicalOne (September 23, 2008 at 4:47 am)
"Giant five-story warehouse with missing trusses" he says at 6:05. He's talking about Seoul, South Korea's Sam Poong Dept. Store that collapsed in 1998. It was not missing trusses, the criminally negligent designers made the supports very narrow, with no drop panels to spread the weight. Hence, the support pillars punched through the floor. 5th floor fell to the 4th, those fell to the 3rd, etc. 501 people were killed in that disaster.
kallikusta (September 22, 2008 at 3:31 am)
By bullshit I mean:
WWI:
Civilian ocean liner was pilotted into German controlled waters in war time and like expected was sunk by Uboats.
WWII:
Pearl harbour was known about weeks in advance, the US was told by Australian intelligence, and it was prevoked. (Bet you didn't know that did ya? Of course not)
Vietnam:
The destroyers that were attacked turned out to be a "mistake". IE, a complete lie.

If you want too know why you've been lied too and still are look up the federal reserve.
Cheers.
YesMyNameIsMichael (September 13, 2008 at 8:37 pm)
9-11 = Inside Job

Nothing else...
END.
pikechris1 (September 14, 2008 at 3:43 am)
bogus
Tairaa2 (July 23, 2008 at 7:41 am)
By bullshit I mean:
WWI:
Civilian ocean liner was pilotted into German controlled waters in war time and like expected was sunk by Uboats.
WWII:
Pearl harbour was known about weeks in advance, the US was told by Australian intelligence, and it was prevoked. (Bet you didn't know that did ya? Of course not)
Vietnam:
The destroyers that were attacked turned out to be a "mistake". IE, a complete lie.

If you want too know why you've been lied too and still are look up the federal reserve.
Cheers.
Tairaa2 (July 23, 2008 at 7:37 am)
Are you serious? This is a structural analysis... :|

Anyway, yes it was planned. It was an inside job. The reason for US involvement in WWI, WWII, and Veitnam was all bullshit, so why wouldn't the official 9/11 story be bullshit too?
Pentagast (June 11, 2008 at 8:27 pm)
So you're claiming that 9/11 was planned so far in advance that they purposefully weakened the exterior shell of the building DURING the initial construction?
bassman5123 (September 11, 2008 at 4:05 am)
Pentagast: The NIST report, with it's "failed truss" theory, completely ignored that the exterior wall even existed. They had to, because if they acknowledged its existence, their story (and I mean story), wouldn't be possible.