The Origin and Myth of 'Al Qaeda'
BackThis is a clip from the 3-part BBC series "The Power of Nightmares." Here, the origins of the name "al Qaeda" are explained, as is the myth of the power and reach of Osama bin Laden and the so-called "al Qaeda network."
This excellent 3-hour documentary is a must-see for all people concerned with their liberty and freedom. Watch the full documentary THE POWER OF NIGHTMARES right now on Google Video!
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: June 27, 2007 at 6:14 pm
Author: grandtheftcountry
Length: 00:09:58
Rating: 4.63
Views: 16002
Tags: al Qaeda Qaida Osama Bin Laden 9/11 September 11th Terrorism Arab Iraq War Israel False Flag New World Order Media Myths
Video Comments:
DofS1 (October 10, 2008 at 1:02 am)
'Terrorism' is a fools religion.
cheatinc (October 6, 2008 at 2:32 am)
kinda like that we make them fight the soviets...then they run loose...they fight us,
VN70 (September 19, 2008 at 9:14 am)
I guess some here are also in disagreement with Bin Laden who said he ordered it and said he has agents all over the world. Add one more attack now..Yemen...again.
abujahl007 (September 15, 2008 at 11:45 pm)
It is Paki colonialism that is responsible for Al-Qaeda and the taliban. The truth is that the Taliban, and its al-Qaida guests, were originally imposed on Afghanistan from without as a projection of Pakistani state power. (Along with Pakistan, only Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates ever recognized the Taliban as the legal government in Kabul.)
hoover20076 (August 24, 2008 at 6:33 am)
I think I love you.
Pocketass666 (August 2, 2008 at 12:49 am)
watch terror storm by alex jones, the dude isnt always right, but he certainly is right about 9/11
xYxYxYxYxYx (July 25, 2008 at 10:15 pm)
Aye. I agree with you completely. Like how they train people to strap bombs to themselves and walk into populated areas to detonate them.
Pocketass666 (August 2, 2008 at 12:51 am)
look at it this way, they are strapping bombs to themselves as a last resort, while being constantly bombarded with high tech weapons by a OCCUPATIONAL FORCE
its not like we have any reason or right to be there!
its not like we have any reason or right to be there!
OneBigRetard (September 7, 2008 at 4:56 am)
er... we have right and reason.
drewhenderson13 (October 4, 2008 at 3:28 am)
why dont we have a right to be there? and where is "there?" iraq? afganastan? dont just make a random statement, be clear and back it up with some information.
and dont say "occupational force" that implys that we are there to gain territory which we are not. america hasent actually taken territory since the time of western expansion. the only way we can gain territory now is if the people of that country vote to become a state.
and dont say "occupational force" that implys that we are there to gain territory which we are not. america hasent actually taken territory since the time of western expansion. the only way we can gain territory now is if the people of that country vote to become a state.
-
Menu
World Defense industry Files -
Tags:
wdif military tsk silah sanayi jet figters Tank JSF Lockheed weapons Attack Helicopters Predator navy Airforce Armed forces Army Missile su37 f16 Airshow dogfight f18 Cobra aselsan uav red flag fighter aviation patriot missile s 300 navy ships nato longbow havoc rooivalk KA-50 iraq war mangusta a129 merkava abrams t-90 submarine u209 exocet zubr kornet drone sparrow uav dasault rafale trmilitary Manuevers Northrop Grumman Raytheon BAE Systems L-3 Communications General Dynamics V-22 Osprey Textron EADS Defense Thales defence Saab Defense Otokar Russian Submarine