Canadian Forces Fire Fight in Afganistan Part 4
BackCanadian Forces battle Taliban in Afganistan
Other parts
Channel: Entertainment
Uploaded: July 27, 2006 at 5:44 pm
Author: 00SoldierofFortune00
Length: 00:02:26
Rating: 4.70
Views: 294230
Tags: Canadian Forces battle Taliban in Afganistan Army Military
Video Comments:
truthmttrs23 (September 7, 2008 at 10:10 am)
even if we had fucking powder rifles........and we have someones back...that should be good enough...stick the negative comments up your arse............
rider4343 (September 7, 2008 at 12:27 am)
fwa ur a prick. the only reason were over there is to support our friend and neihgbour the U.S. the m145 gets the job done just fine. its assholes like you who make the rest the world second gues our dicision to chip in. I wonder how your war in afgahn would go with out the 48,000 nato forces there to help.
Tr3sTis (September 4, 2008 at 12:24 am)
when im 16 im joining the reserves
poundaround (September 2, 2008 at 4:13 am)
i think that might be an afghani tank, not sure though
HomerSimpson180 (September 2, 2008 at 10:12 am)
it was a lav3 a canadian light armored personnal carrier
poundaround (September 3, 2008 at 1:45 am)
oh i see it just looks like whoever is driving is just in training so i figured it was an afghan hahah
fwa11b (September 1, 2008 at 1:27 pm)
lol he had a m145 on his M4...what a tool.
Guess the canucks are too poor for ACOGs.
Guess the canucks are too poor for ACOGs.
HomerSimpson180 (September 2, 2008 at 10:10 am)
funny m145 is just as good as the acog and it is ment for the m4 u tool o and the us army also use them retard
fwa11b (September 2, 2008 at 4:23 pm)
Yeah, for our M240 Bravos and M249 SAWs.
And if you've ever used an M145 (which i doubt) the damn things are fucking horrible. It's hard as fuck to get a decent sight picture off of it.
And it has range ticks all the way up to 800 meters which you dont need on an m4. Why? max range point target with an M4 is 500m, area target (more than one person) 600m.
Way to look like a jackass.
I hate ACOGs too though, i use an EOtech 553 on my 203, so its whatever.
And if you've ever used an M145 (which i doubt) the damn things are fucking horrible. It's hard as fuck to get a decent sight picture off of it.
And it has range ticks all the way up to 800 meters which you dont need on an m4. Why? max range point target with an M4 is 500m, area target (more than one person) 600m.
Way to look like a jackass.
I hate ACOGs too though, i use an EOtech 553 on my 203, so its whatever.
TheChristianCrusader (September 1, 2008 at 4:18 am)
Diemaco C7A1
-
Menu
World Defense industry Files -
Tags:
wdif military tsk silah sanayi jet figters Tank JSF Lockheed weapons Attack Helicopters Predator navy Airforce Armed forces Army Missile su37 f16 Airshow dogfight f18 Cobra aselsan uav red flag fighter aviation patriot missile s 300 navy ships nato longbow havoc rooivalk KA-50 iraq war mangusta a129 merkava abrams t-90 submarine u209 exocet zubr kornet drone sparrow uav dasault rafale trmilitary Manuevers Northrop Grumman Raytheon BAE Systems L-3 Communications General Dynamics V-22 Osprey Textron EADS Defense Thales defence Saab Defense Otokar Russian Submarine