Ken Miller on Intelligent Design

Back


Ken Miller's talk on Intelligent Design at Case Western University. Ken Miller basically rips Intelligent Design apart in a 2 hour long exposé of the claims of intelligent design and the tactics that creationists employ to get it shoehorned into the American school system.

Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: January 6, 2006 at 10:12 am
Author: theblur

Length: 01:57:10
Rating: 4.75
Views: 459963

Tags: religion politics intelligent design evolution biology

Video Comments:
ATrainDopeMan (October 8, 2008 at 9:20 am)
Really??? You're going to use the watchmaker fallacy? Intelligent design states that there was a creator. Evolution has no stance on the topic. This is the primary reason why evolution is taught in schools.
MottomoShiroi (October 8, 2008 at 4:29 am)
Get ready for HTBK's logical fallacy hour, everyone! Open your buttholes for a dogma enema!
warren52nz (October 8, 2008 at 4:14 am)
It's not up to Scientists to disprove God's existence (it can't be done anyway). It's up to those that put forward a theory to support it not the other way around.

If I say there's a teapot in orbit, do you think it's everyone else's duty to disprove it? Of course not. My whacko theory (and yours too if you're a Creationist) is to prove it. Go for it... I need a good laugh!
Zamusse (October 8, 2008 at 2:19 am)
watch our videos you'll laugh

&& subscribe we appreciate it :)
redwings1952 (October 8, 2008 at 1:04 am)
Well DUH. Creationism can never be falsified. That's why it is not a scientific theory.
aurorarose09 (October 8, 2008 at 12:17 am)
Creaation was never falsified, you are misinformed. God bless you.
Renfield37 (October 8, 2008 at 12:11 am)
yes.. but what god does he believe in...
i know there is only 1 God, but when he says that.. he could really be meaning himself, or time, or evolution. if he did really know and believe in God and the truth, he would not be lying and wanting to think evolution happend, because he would already know the truth
MottomoShiroi (October 8, 2008 at 12:10 am)
"You don't have to prove a creator to prove that something was created. The Sphinx was obviously created." Indeed. But IDers might as well be saying "The Sphinx must've been created by aliens with advanced technology. Ancient Egyptians couldn't have built this with their primitive technology!" in regards to life.
guitarplyr2255 (October 8, 2008 at 12:01 am)
You don't have to prove a creator to prove that something was created. The Sphinx was obviously created. You can argue about who created it and when but the fact that's it's created is still there.
middlekk (October 7, 2008 at 11:27 pm)
Oh, by the way, this was supposed to be a debate, but the creationist backed out. Maybe because he knew Dr. Miller would completely OWN him?