Jim Carrey - Call to Action on Burma and Aung San Suu Kyi
BackJim Carrey calls for people to support the world's only imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize recipient Aung San Suu Kyi. He also decries Burma's military regime for recruiting more child soldiers than any other country in the world, destroying 3,000 villages in eastern Burma, and forcing 1.5 million refugees to flee. He appeals to viewers to join two organizations:
The Human Rights Action Center
www.humanrightsactioncenter.org
U.S. Campaign for Burma
www.uscampaignforburma.org
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: August 28, 2007 at 12:56 am
Author: uscampaignforburma
Length: 00:01:21
Rating: 4.81
Views: 711053
Tags: Jim Carrey Aung San Suu Kyi U.S. Campaign for Burma Myanmar Human Rights Action Center
Video Comments:
cmdrchris971 (June 16, 2008 at 10:04 pm)
since when does jim carrey have long hair
Dankill82 (June 8, 2008 at 7:02 pm)
Just like in Afghanistan after Rambo III, the character has become an underground symbol of defiance after the movie was released and immediately banned in Burma and anyone that was part of it would be arrested if they ever set foot in Burma. The movie is widely pirated in Burma, but owning a copy of the DVD
carries a 10 year jail term and selling the DVDs is Death. As silly as it might seem, Rambo is one of the few symbols of hope these people have as a way to defy their rulers.
carries a 10 year jail term and selling the DVDs is Death. As silly as it might seem, Rambo is one of the few symbols of hope these people have as a way to defy their rulers.
bWWd0 (June 8, 2008 at 8:26 am)
ace stop reading
jamesfrancis5 (June 7, 2008 at 5:59 am)
wow this is not getting any coverage at all, last comment over a month ago?
moloneycian32 (June 6, 2008 at 7:58 pm)
Because NATO is a figure head for the US military backed by its allies. NATO will never engage in a conflict unless there is somthing to gain from it(ie.oil). If it was the case that NATO did act in accordance to its mandate, it would be in places such as Darfur or Sri Lankia. crosboid got it spot on11
undertaker23101993 (June 6, 2008 at 6:56 pm)
I felt sad about this
jesb0787 (June 4, 2008 at 7:40 pm)
thats a great point, and unfortunately, there are a dozen more organizations that also should have stepped in by now, most prominently the UN. it's the same reason nobody did anything for Darfur...which is still happening fyi...and why nobody is doing anything for Kenya.
Shalebridge (June 4, 2008 at 12:44 am)
Sounds like you are unable to take things in context then.
DorkBox (June 1, 2008 at 1:05 am)
This is one of the many, many reasons this man has been my hero and idol for as long as I can remember. He's such a caring and kind person. He's just so..genuine. I want to be just like him someday.
angstriddenyouth (May 30, 2008 at 10:43 pm)
The UN have done nothing to help the people of Burma. We need to keep putting pressure on them to actually stand up for human rights for once, and not just try to appease an undemocratic, brutal regime.
-
Menu
World Defense industry Files -
Tags:
wdif military tsk silah sanayi jet figters Tank JSF Lockheed weapons Attack Helicopters Predator navy Airforce Armed forces Army Missile su37 f16 Airshow dogfight f18 Cobra aselsan uav red flag fighter aviation patriot missile s 300 navy ships nato longbow havoc rooivalk KA-50 iraq war mangusta a129 merkava abrams t-90 submarine u209 exocet zubr kornet drone sparrow uav dasault rafale trmilitary Manuevers Northrop Grumman Raytheon BAE Systems L-3 Communications General Dynamics V-22 Osprey Textron EADS Defense Thales defence Saab Defense Otokar Russian Submarine